COMMENTARYTone rules (what we ship)We write like: - calm - specific - non-performative We avoid: - gamification - shame language - hype metaphorsAdded by · Connections (11) · Comments (20) · Saves & Shares (272)
NOTABLEOn product copyEmpty states should explain the *benefit*, not the feature.Add contextLinear App ↗Curated by · Connections (9) · Comments (6) · Saves & Shares (561)
QUOTABLEWriting for interfacesAn error message is the product meeting reality.Add contextNotion SO ↗Curated by · Connections (6) · Comments (13) · Saves & Shares (427)
VIDEOVerified11:24Microcopy & Product Language Library — clip 1Worth it for minutes 5–8Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Used in: Internal briefYouTube ↗Curated by · Connections (2) · Comments (3) · Saves & Shares (146)
VIDEOVerified16:08Microcopy & Product Language Library — clip 2Worth it for minutes 10–14Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Used in: Internal briefYouTube ↗Curated by · Connections (3) · Comments (4) · Saves & Shares (168)
VIDEOVerified18:42Microcopy & Product Language Library — clip 3Worth it for minutes 12–18Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Used in: Internal briefReliability: High confidenceYouTube ↗Curated by · Connections (4) · Comments (5) · Saves & Shares (190)
DATAMust ReadKey number42%YoYKey number with short context.Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Referenced in: Internal briefIEEE Spectrum ↗Curated by · Connections (15) · Comments (6) · Saves & Shares (395)
DATAMust ReadKey number42%YoYKey number with short context.Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Referenced in: Internal briefSource: Low confidenceIEEE Spectrum ↗Curated by · Connections (2) · Comments (5) · Saves & Shares (395)
CLAIMTo VerifyClaimThis claim should be treated as testable, not inspirational.Source says: Source says…Why it matters: This will show up in onboarding behavior.Theverge ↗Curated by · Connections (15) · Comments (16) · Saves & Shares (438)
CLAIMKey ClaimClaimThis claim should be treated as testable, not inspirational.Source says: Source says…Why it matters: This will show up in onboarding behavior.Reliability: Medium confidenceTheverge ↗Curated by · Connections (2) · Comments (17) · Saves & Shares (438)
QUESTIONDraftResolvedQuestionWhat are we trying to answer?Working answer: collect 2–3 proof points.Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Added by · Connections (7) · Comments (10) · Saves & Shares (217)
QUESTIONDraftOpenQuestionWhat are we trying to answer?Working answer: collect 2–3 proof points.Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Added by · Connections (8) · Comments (9) · Saves & Shares (217)
QUESTIONDraftOpenQuestionWhat are we trying to answer?Working answer: collect 2–3 proof points.Why it matters: This is trust language, not marketing.Added by · Connections (9) · Comments (8) · Saves & Shares (217)
DECISIONVerifiedDecisionDecision: document the tradeoffChoose the constraint that sets the timeline.Avoid scope creep; keep the artifact legible.Align on what evidence would change this.Supported by 10 nodesUsed in: Internal briefAdded by · Connections (11) · Thread: 3 open points · Saves & Shares (269)
COMMENTARYVerifiedWorking noteA short working note that captures the board’s current stance (mock).Why it matters: This will show up in onboarding behavior.Used in: Internal briefAdded by · Connections (4) · Comments (13) · Saves & Shares (219)
NOTABLETo VerifySource noteA concise notable: what changed and why it matters.Add contextWhy it matters: This will show up in onboarding behavior.Used in: Internal briefBBC ↗Curated by · Connections (11) · Thread: 3 open points · Saves & Shares (438)