NOTE
Diligence posture: contradictions first
Added by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (271)
Participants
InternalConfidential
Deal Notes: Atlas Robotics
Diligence snippets, contradictions, and what to verify next.
market sizemoatteam
Sam (Owner) · Dr. (Partner) · 4 more
Nodes
16
Contributors
6
Saves
4,960
Shares
213
Last updated
yesterday
This week
17 adds
What to verify next
- Retention by segment + churn reasons (not just logo churn).
- Customer quote vs deck claim: identify contradictions.
- Unit economics under realistic deployment constraints.
To verify
HIGHLIGHT
Market size claims are inconsistent across decks and interviews.
Takeaway: Ask for cohort retention by segment.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (427)
Strong signal
QUOTE
A moat is what customers would miss if you disappeared tomorrow.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (728)
MEDIATo Verify
Worth it for minutes 5–8
Why it matters: This is where the story contradicts itself.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (146)
MEDIADraft
Worth it for minutes 10–14
Why it matters: This is where the story contradicts itself.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Dr. · · · Saves & Shares (168)
MEDIADraft
Worth it for minutes 12–18
Why it matters: This is where the story contradicts itself.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Mara · · · Saves & Shares (190)
DATA
Key number
$84B
(2025E)
Market size estimate (assumptions noted in the linked filing).
Why it matters: This determines whether the moat is real.
Referenced in: Deal memo
Source: High confidence
Curated by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (395)
DATA
Key number
$84B
(2025E)
Market size estimate (assumptions noted in the linked filing).
Why it matters: This determines whether the moat is real.
Referenced in: Deal memo
Curated by Dr. · · · Saves & Shares (395)
CLAIMKey Claim
Claim
Retention is improving because the product is becoming a default workflow.
Source says: Source says…
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Curated by Jun · · · Saves & Shares (438)
CLAIMKey Claim
Claim
Retention is improving because the product is becoming a default workflow.
Source says: Source says…
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Curated by Mara · · · Saves & Shares (438)
QUESTIONDraftOpen
Question
What would falsify the moat?
Working answer: look for contradictions in retention vs usage.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Added by Sam · · · Saves & Shares (217)
QUESTIONDraftResolved
Question
What would falsify the moat?
Working answer: look for contradictions in retention vs usage.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Added by Emily · · · Saves & Shares (217)
QUESTIONDraftOpen
Question
What would falsify the moat?
Working answer: look for contradictions in retention vs usage.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Added by Tessa · · · Saves & Shares (217)
DECISIONVerified
Decision
Decision: verify retention before pricing model
- Choose the constraint that sets the timeline.
- Avoid scope creep; keep the artifact legible.
- Align on what evidence would change this.
Supported by 12 nodes
Used in: Deal memo
Added by Mara · · · Saves & Shares (269)
NOTEVerified
Working note
Why it matters: This determines whether the moat is real.
Used in: Deal memo
Added by Tessa · · · Saves & Shares (219)
HIGHLIGHTTo Verify
A concise notable: what changed and why it matters.
Takeaway: Takeaway: assign an owner and a next step.
Why it matters: If this is false, the deck collapses.
Used in: Deal memo
Curated by Tessa · · · Saves & Shares (438)